TERMIUM Plus®

The Government of Canada’s terminology and linguistic data bank.

DOCTRINE RETARD INDU [1 record]

Record 1 2008-09-10

English

Subject field(s)
  • Tort Law (common law)
CONT

For acquiescence to be invoked there must be overt consent to or active encouragement of the defendant's activity. Merely standing idly by is not enough. Thus, acquiescence is distinguishable from the doctrine of laches.

French

Domaine(s)
  • Droit des délits (common law)
CONT

Pour qu'on puisse invoquer l'acquiescement, il doit y avoir consentement manifeste ou incitation active à l'activité du défendeur. La simple inaction passive ne suffit pas. Ainsi, l'acquiescement se distingue de la doctrine de l'inertie («laches»).

OBS

retard indu : équivalent de «laches» relevé au Recueil des arrêts de la Cour Suprême du Canada selon le Lexique anglais-français de la common law, 1990.

Spanish

Save record 1

Copyright notice for the TERMIUM Plus® data bank

© Public Services and Procurement Canada, 2024
TERMIUM Plus®, the Government of Canada's terminology and linguistic data bank
A product of the Translation Bureau

Features

Language Portal of Canada

Access a collection of Canadian resources on all aspects of English and French, including quizzes.

Writing tools

The Language Portal’s writing tools have a new look! Easy to consult, they give you access to a wealth of information that will help you write better in English and French.

Glossaries and vocabularies

Access Translation Bureau glossaries and vocabularies.

Date Modified: