TERMIUM Plus^®

Fiche 1,  Justifications,  Anglais

Record number: 1, Textual support number: 1 CONT

For a de facto taking requiring compensation at common law, two requirements must be met :(1) an acquisition of a beneficial interest in the property or flowing from it, and(2) removal of all reasonable uses of the property...  3, fiche 1, Anglais, - de%20facto%20taking

Fiche 1,  Justifications,  Français

Record number: 1, Textual support number: 1 CONT

Pour qu'une appropriation de fait impose une indemnisation en common law, deux conditions doivent être remplies : (1) l'acquisition d'un intérêt bénéficiaire dans le bien‑fonds ou d'un droit découlant de ce bien; (2) la suppression de toutes les utilisations raisonnables du bien‑fonds ...  3, fiche 1, Français, - appropriation%20de%20fait

Fiche 1,  Justifications,  Espagnol

Fiche 2,  Justifications,  Anglais

Record number: 2, Textual support number: 1 OBS

The essential difference between legal and equitable rights is best understood by comparing absolute ownership with trusts....(A) t this point it is only necessary to appreciate that trusts were unenforceable at common law. If land was conveyed to A in fee simple upon trust for B in fee simple, the common law courts regarded A as absolute owner and would not recognise any rights in B. But the Chancellor would enforce trusts, as matters of conscience, and compel A to hold the land on B's behalf and to allow B to enjoy it. In such a case A is the "legal owner", B is the "equitable owner". The land is vested in A, but since he is trustee of it he is not the beneficial owner : he has only the "bare legal estate", and the beneficial interest belongs to B. Now legal ownership confers rights "in rem", rights of property in the land itself, which can be enforced against anyone. Equitable ownership conferred at first only a right "in personam", a right to compel the trustee personally to perform his trust.(Megarry & Wade, 4th ed., 1975, p. 113).  1, fiche 2, Anglais, - legal%20ownership

Fiche 2,  Justifications,  Français

Record number: 2, Textual support number: 1 OBS

propriété en common law : terme normalisé par le Comité de normalisation dans le cadre du Programme national de l'administration de la justice dans les deux langues officielles (PAJLO).  2, fiche 2, Français, - propri%C3%A9t%C3%A9%20en%20common%20law

Fiche 2,  Justifications,  Espagnol