TERMIUM Plus^®

Fiche 1,  Justifications,  Anglais

Record number: 1, Textual support number: 1 OBS

In 1978, Canada, along wich Japan and the United States, signed a Protocol modifying the International Convention for the High Seas Fisheries of the North Pacific Ocean. This Protocol provides further protection for salmon of Canadian origin from Japanese high-seas fishing vessels. Canada and the United States also continued to pursue bilateral negotiations towards a salmon interception agreement to establish effecive mechanisms to ensure that both nations benefited from their own conservation and enhancement programs.  1, fiche 1, Anglais, - salmon%2Dinterception%20agreement

Fiche 1,  Justifications,  Français

Record number: 1, Textual support number: 1 OBS

En 1978, le Canada a signé de concert avec le Japon et les États-Unis un Protocole modifiant la convention internationale concernant les pêcheries hautières de l'océan Pacifique Nord. Cet instrument a pour effet de mieux protéger le saumon d'origine canadienne contre la pêche hautière japonaise. Le Canada et les États-Unis ont aussi poursuivi leurs négociations bilatérales en vue de conclure un accord sur l'interception du saumon qui établirait des mécanismes efficaces permettant aux deux nations de tirer tous les avantages de leurs programmes respectifs de conservation et de mise en valeur des pêches.  1, fiche 1, Français, - accord%20sur%20l%27interception%20du%20saumon

Fiche 1,  Justifications,  Espagnol

Fiche 2,  Justifications,  Anglais

Record number: 2, Textual support number: 1 OBS

In 1964, Congress passed the Bartlett Act(Pub. L. No 88-308, 78 Stat. 194) which excluded foreign vessels from fishing within the United States’ territorial sea, defined as all ocean waters within three miles from the coast. Two years later, Congress passed the Contiguous Fisheries Zone Act(Pub. L. No. 89-658, 80 Stat. 908), which created a nine-mile contiguous zone extending out from the three-mile limit, from which foreign fishing vessels would be excluded. These acts and treaties failed to protect U. S. fisheries as they were intended to. The Bartlett Act provided no authority for federal management measures, limiting the federal government's role to data collection and law enforcement against foreign fishers. Other nations also found their fisheries to be suffering, as most treaties provided no means of enforcement against nations who had not chosen to enter into an agreement. As a result, several countries moved to extend the area of their marine jurisdiction. By 1975, of the parties involved in ongoing law-of-the-sea negotiations, sixty nations including the United States, favored a twelve-mile territorial sea and a two-hundred-mile resource conservation zone.  1, fiche 2, Anglais, - Bartlett%20Act

Fiche 2,  Justifications,  Français

Fiche 2,  Justifications,  Espagnol