TERMIUM Plus^®

Fiche 1,  Justifications,  Anglais

Record number: 1, Textual support number: 1 CONT

The adverse consequences of romantic rejection are illustrated by Novak v. Waterfront Comm’n [Commission] of N. Y. [New York] Harbor. The plaintiff, Shanti Novak, was a detective with the Waterfront Commission of N. Y. Harbor. She became romantically involved with Scott Politano at a time when both held the same rank, in different locations. Eventually the two became live-in partners, and during this time, Politano was promoted to Lieutenant and was transferred to Novak's office, consequently becoming her supervisor. Novak terminated her relationship with Politano shortly thereafter. After her breakup with Politano, Novak was singled out for unfavorable treatment even after Politano was replaced as Novak's supervisor. Novak was given unfavorable work and shift assignments; was subjected to heightened scrutiny with respect to her work and her requests for overtime pay and sick leave; was the only detective not to receive further formal detective training; was excluded from an email regarding a shooting range schedule; and was the only detective to whom newly hired detectives were not assigned, which was both humiliating and deprived her of the opportunity to learn from the new assignees, who were seasoned detectives from other agencies. The situation became worse after she complained to the human resources department.  2, fiche 1, Anglais, - live%2Din%20partner

Fiche 1,  Justifications,  Français

Fiche 1,  Justifications,  Espagnol

Fiche 2,  Justifications,  Anglais

Record number: 2, Textual support number: 1 OBS

On 1 May 2001, the Hamilton Harbour Commission became the Hamilton Port Authority (HPA).  4, fiche 2, Anglais, - Hamilton%20Port%20Authority

Fiche 2,  Justifications,  Français

Record number: 2, Textual support number: 1 OBS

Le 1er mai 2001, la Commission du havre de Hamilton est devenue l'Administration portuaire de Hamilton (APH).  2, fiche 2, Français, - Administration%20portuaire%20de%20Hamilton

Fiche 2,  Justifications,  Espagnol

Fiche 3,  Justifications,  Anglais

Fiche 3,  Justifications,  Français

Record number: 3, Textual support number: 1 OBS

Le port a été créé en 1961 selon la Commission du port de Nanaïmo, et s'est transformé en l'Administration portuaire de Nanaïmo le 1 juillet 1999, et ce, en vertu de la Loi maritime du Canada. Le port est une agence fédérale dont le mandat est d'administrer, de contrôler, de gérer et de protéger la navigation et d'assurer la sécurité du port de Nanaïmo. L'Administration portuaire de Nanaïmo est tenue d'être financièrement indépendante et elle n'est pas admissible à aucun type de financement fédéral. Le port doit demeurer compétitif et conserver son rôle de catalyseur dans l'amélioration du secteur maritime de Nanaïmo.  3, fiche 3, Français, - Administration%20portuaire%20de%20Nana%C3%AFmo

Fiche 3,  Justifications,  Espagnol

Fiche 4,  Justifications,  Français

Fiche 4,  Justifications,  Espagnol

Fiche 5,  Justifications,  Français

Fiche 5,  Justifications,  Espagnol

Fiche 6,  Justifications,  Français

Fiche 6,  Justifications,  Espagnol

Fiche 7,  Justifications,  Anglais

Record number: 7, Textual support number: 1 OBS

Of the Canadian Marine Transportation Administration (CMTA).  1, fiche 7, Anglais, - Harbour%20Commission

Fiche 7,  Justifications,  Français

Record number: 7, Textual support number: 1 OBS

De l'Administration canadienne du transport maritime (ACTM).  1, fiche 7, Français, - Commission%20portuaire

Fiche 7,  Justifications,  Espagnol